Ella Morgan

Concert Culture: The Good And The Bad

Concerts are literally some of the best experiences you can have but sometimes, they’re not perfect. There’s a good side and a bad side to concert culture, and if you’re planning to go to your first show, you should probably know both.

The Good Stuff

First off, concerts are just a great experience, especially if you go with the right people. The second the lights go out and the artist steps on stage, it’s like the whole place explodes. You’re surrounded by people who love the same music you do, and even if some of the people around you cannot sing you still appreciate every minute of it. Everyone’s singing, dancing, screaming , it’s pure happiness.

Another awesome thing is the connection. Sometimes the artist will stop mid-show and just talk to the crowd, telling stories or saying how much they love their fans. It’s super personal and makes you feel like you’re seen, even if you’re in the nosebleeds with binoculars.

Plus, the memories you make at concerts are unmatched. Even if you lose your voice and your legs hurt the next day, you’ll always remember the night you screamed your heart out with a stadium full of people.

The Bad

Concerts can also be rough.First of all, the crowds. If you don’t like being squished between sweaty strangers, you might have a bad time. People will shove you, step on you, and some won’t even say sorry. Especially in general admission (aka standing areas),it’s like survival of the fittest in there, especially for me standing at 5”3, I see people shorter then me around and I wonder how they are feeling.

Also, getting tickets is a whole nightmare. You think you’re gonna be fine, but then Ticketmaster decides to put you at 30,000 in the queue . And IF you somehow manage to get a ticket, it costs so much money.

Finally, there’s always the risk of bad crowd behavior. Some people don’t know how to act, they push, they fight, they throw stuff on stage. It can turn what should be a fun night into a stressful one if people don’t respect each other.

Final Thoughts

Even with all the downsides, concerts are still SO worth it. Yeah, you might get shoved around and spend too much money, but the feeling of seeing your favorite artist live is just unbeatable. You’ll laugh, maybe cry, probably lose your voice, but most importantly, you’ll leave with memories you’ll never forget.

Are Books Better Than Their Movie Adaptations? Settling the Debate

The debate over whether books or their movie adaptations are better has been ongoing for years. To get a better understanding of both sides, I asked people around campus about their favorite and least favorite book-to-film adaptations. The responses varied, but a few stood out as clear favorites (and disappointments).

Books Are Better: The Case for Harry Potter

One of the most popular responses I received was that the Harry Potter books are far better then the movies. Many fans felt that the films left out too many details that made the books special. J.K. Rowling’s writing brings the wizarding world to life in a way that the movies, despite their visual magic, simply couldn’t capture. The inner thoughts of characters, side plots, and deeper lore of the wizarding world were often cut or altered for the sake of time, leaving book fans feeling like the films, while enjoyable, didn’t do the books justice.

Movies Are Better: The Case for The Hunger Games

On the other hand, many people I spoke to preferred The Hunger Games movies over the books. Interestingly, some admitted they had never read the books, which might explain their preference for the films. However, even those who had read Suzanne Collins’ novels still found the movies more compelling. They praised the way the films were put together, from the performances of the actors, particularly Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss. The films managed to capture the intensity of the story while streamlining certain elements to make it more visually impactful.

Final Verdict: It’s All About Perspective

So, are books always better than their movie adaptations? Based on my conversations, the answer isn’t so simple. It largely depends on what you value more in a story, depth and detail, or visual storytelling and performances. While books allow readers to immerse themselves in the author’s world, movies have the power to bring those stories to life in ways that can be just as powerful, if not more so.

At the end of the day, whether a book or its adaptation is better is entirely subjective. Some stories work better on the page, while others shine on the screen. Maybe the real takeaway is this, instead of choosing one over the other, why not enjoy both?